NO VIGENTE Centro Auxiliar Ciudad de la Costa
Between 2008 and 2011, NO VIGENTE Centro Auxiliar Ciudad de la Costa appears as a buyer in 782 records from ARCE historical procurement awards, which amount to ≈483 unique processes. The most frequent supplier, Isafer LTDA., accounts for 3% of the records shared with suppliers (bounded estimate). In Apr 2011, the number of processes is 14.3% lower than in Mar 2011. Monetary totals are omitted because the source repeats lifecycle rows for each process.
Create and download this entity’s chart- Source records
- 782
- Sources
- 1
Observed volume
≈483 processes
782 source rows in ARCE historical procurement awards.
Latest activity
Apr 2011
16 records in the period.
Latest comparable change
-1 processes
Mar 2011 → Apr 2011 (-14.3%)
History
NO VIGENTE Centro Auxiliar Ciudad de la Costa: processes by period
Jan 2008–Apr 2011
Relationships
Top counterparties in the records
Ranked by shared record count, without adding different currencies.
Relationship concentration
Reliance on leading suppliers
Each currency is calculated separately. A high share may reflect specialization, scale, or source coverage and is not by itself evidence of misconduct.
Recent activity
Latest published records
Ordered by the most relevant award, publication, or event date in each source. An identical event published by multiple lifecycle sources is shown once and retains every source in the first column. This does not claim the activity happened today.
The summary is available, but a recent record sample could not be loaded. Consult the records in the cited sources.
Entity monitoring
Monitor NO VIGENTE Centro Auxiliar Ciudad de la Costa
Get an email when linked records change. Alerts make clear that a change may be new activity, broader coverage, or a source correction.
Coverage and provenance
Sources contributing to this profile
Procurement histories collapse repeated lifecycle rows when process identifiers are complete and mark incomplete identifiers as approximate.
Headline monetary rollups are omitted because the primary history cannot deduplicate lifecycle snapshots to award-line values safely; source-row counts remain available in provenance.
This profile consolidates source keys within one country and role only through exact identifiers or an unambiguous normalized legal name. Currencies and unit scales remain separate; similar names are not assumed to be the same organization.