Rodriguez Rodriguez Elida Ester
Between 2007 and 2008 in ARCE historical procurement awards, Rodriguez Rodriguez Elida Ester appears as a supplier in 30 records from ARCE historical procurement awards, which amount to 30 unique processes. The observed amount totals 274,095 UYU. The leading buyer by amount, NO VIGENTE Centro Auxiliar de Paso de los Toros, accounts for 48% of the UYU amount. In Oct 2008, the number of processes is 100% higher than in Sep 2008.
Create and download this entity’s chart- Source records
- 30
- Sources
- 1
Observed volume
30 processes
30 source rows in ARCE historical procurement awards.
Latest activity
Oct 2008
2 records in the period.
Latest comparable change
+1 processes
Sep 2008 → Oct 2008 (+100%)
Leading buyer by amount
48% of observed UYU amount; top three 100%.
History
Historical series by source
2 independent series
Relationships
Top counterparties in the records
Ranked by shared record count, without adding different currencies.
Relationship concentration
Reliance on leading counterparties
Each currency is calculated separately. A high share may reflect specialization, scale, or source coverage and is not by itself evidence of misconduct.
Recent activity
Latest published records
Ordered by the most relevant award, publication, or event date in each source. An identical event published by multiple lifecycle sources is shown once and retains every source in the first column. This does not claim the activity happened today.
The summary is available, but a recent record sample could not be loaded. Consult the records in the cited sources.
Entity monitoring
Monitor Rodriguez Rodriguez Elida Ester
Get an email when linked records change. Alerts make clear that a change may be new activity, broader coverage, or a source correction.
Coverage and provenance
Sources contributing to this profile
This profile consolidates source keys within one country and role only through exact identifiers or an unambiguous normalized legal name. Currencies and unit scales remain separate; similar names are not assumed to be the same organization.