Vitromill S.A.
Between 2004 and 2021 in ARCE historical procurement awards, Vitromill S.A. appears as a supplier in 78 records from ARCE historical procurement awards, which amount to 78 unique processes. The observed amount totals 17,869 USD; UYU amounts are kept separate and not added to that figure. The leading buyer by amount, Comando General del Ejército, accounts for 100% of the USD amount. In Dec 2016, the number of processes is unchanged from Nov 2016.
Create and download this entity’s chart- Source records
- 78
- Sources
- 1
Observed volume
78 processes
78 source rows in ARCE historical procurement awards.
Latest activity
Nov 2021
1 record in the period.
Latest comparable change
No change
Nov 2016 → Dec 2016 · same value
History
Historical series by source
3 independent series
Relationships
Top counterparties in the records
Ranked by shared record count, without adding different currencies.
Relationship concentration
Reliance on leading counterparties
Each currency is calculated separately. A high share may reflect specialization, scale, or source coverage and is not by itself evidence of misconduct.
Recent activity
Latest published records
Ordered by the most relevant award, publication, or event date in each source. An identical event published by multiple lifecycle sources is shown once and retains every source in the first column. This does not claim the activity happened today.
The summary is available, but a recent record sample could not be loaded. Consult the records in the cited sources.
Entity monitoring
Monitor Vitromill S.A.
Get an email when linked records change. Alerts make clear that a change may be new activity, broader coverage, or a source correction.
Coverage and provenance
Sources contributing to this profile
Amounts use multiple currencies or source unit scales and are not added across units.
This profile consolidates source keys within one country and role only through exact identifiers or an unambiguous normalized legal name. Currencies and unit scales remain separate; similar names are not assumed to be the same organization.